Sunday, January 31, 2010


The Wars of Appeasement

Many Americans are asking their selves what are our elected officials are doing, because most of the time the things that they do are so stupid {if our president can use the word stupid I guess I can too.} We could talk about heath care, the high unemployment rate, and many other issues that need to be addressed and they are doing a very poor job of addressing those issues as we all can see.

But I cannot and will not ever understand why this congress and the Obama administration will send our money to support a country or people that are terrorist and if these terrorist had their chance would wipe us off the face of the earth. We have a president that will not even use the word terrorist or recognize terrorism for what it is. We have the head of homeland security that is more worried about the returning troops, the people who listen to talk radio, the so called tea baggers, and people who cling to their Bibles and guns, than she is about Muslim terrorist. We cannot profile even though nearly, if not all, of the terrorist attacks against this country are by Muslims. People should have no problem with profiling as long it is for the security of this nation and its people.

The president is turning the terrorist detainees who are held at Gitmo loose and sending back to the Middle East where they rejoin other terrorist groups to wage war against us again. We have tied the hands of the CIA and by doing this we have compromised the security of this nation. The prisoners of war are now given their Miranda warnings and are tried in civilian courts and given the same rights as the United States citizen has. They are given a stage to promote their ideology. Can you imagine this happening in WW Two?

To even make matters worse our government is paying for everything. This past week 54 Democratic members of Congress wrote Obama a letter asking him to apply pressure on Israel to remove its restrictions on the import of goods -- including dual use goods like construction materials, to the Hamas-controlled Gaza. Never mind that under United States law it is legally difficult to provide any aid, (including the $300 million Obama has pledged) to Gaza in light of the fact that it is controlled and ruled by a terrorist organization that is not only against the tiny nation of Israel, which the Hamas calls "The Little Satan" but also considers the United States the "Big Satan". Why are we giving away money to a terrorist origination that wants to destroy us and our freedoms?


This kind of leadership is nothing new for the people in Washington. This kind of policy started during the Korean War, which to this day our government calls a "police action". Obama did not start this policy of given in to our enemy, he just expounded on it until it has become ludicrous and dangerous. Starting with the Korean War our troops were sent to fight, and die, but were never allowed to win. The man who could have lead us to victory in that war, Douglas MacArthur, was fired and sent home in disgrace because he spoke out on the polices of our government that would not allow our soldiers to win the war. MacArthur, along with millions of other Americans, wanted to know why thousands of American soldiers were dying in a war that they were not allowed to win. When the killing stopped this country sunk millions of dollars into that country, {North Korea} who to this day is still wanting the destruction of this country and the boundaries are just about the same as they were at the start of that conflict. So nothing was gained by that war but much was lost starting with the thousands of dead, maimed, and injured troops that put their life on the line for their country. Now the Korean conflict is referred to as the "Forgotten War". What a shameful tribute to the thousands of American GIs that lost their life there.


The same goes for the Viet Nam war. Our troops were sent to a war that once again they could not win because their own government tied their hands. They were only allowed to bomb certain places, pursue the enemy so far. Body bags and maimed soldiers were coming back to this country by the plane loads and returning soldiers were spit upon, cussed, and called every name in the book. For this our nation owes these brave men an apology. Returning soldiers could not understand why they were not allowed to win and why they were there fighting and dying. Millions of our tax dollars were sent to that country after the war.

The same thing is happening today with the war on terror. We ask our brave men to go fight and die, but tie their hands. We fight, for what, it is not to win, and all the while we are giving these countries millions of dollars in aid in which 90% of it goes to their war chest that is used against us. That is the way it has been since the Korean War. No wonder the world calls the United States "The Paper Tiger". It is time that this country gets back to the meaning of: "mean what we say and say what we mean", while we still have a country left.


The big difference between the war on terror and the other wars is this: The terrorism for the most part is here on our soil, with the blood of thousands of civilians already lost on 911 in New York, The pentagon, and Pennsylvania. Our government must wake up out of their stupor and realize that no war is won by a "police action", or by having empathy for the enemy as our president wants. As General Patton said during WW2: "No country has won a war by holding their own. We are to keep advancing, kill the enemy, and wade through their blood. I think that is a good idea and I hope that as we do what Patton said that Allah does not run out of virgins to pass out.


Thursday, January 28, 2010

State Of The Union

During the whole of Obama's State of the Union Speech we never heard much if anything at all about the Muslim terrorist that are trying to destroy this country. This is a big issue for this country and we heard very little if nothing at all from Obama on this. He never once said anything about the ongoing conflict with al-Qaida in the state of the union address. He was particularly silent on those elements of American foreign policy during his speech Wednesday night to the nation. We did not hear anything about the ongoing conflict or about the detention center at Guantanamo. All are top challenges facing his administration, and they are very important issues, but they didn't make the cut for his first State of the Union address. That in its self is very scary, not hearing one thing about the security of this nation in his speech, but as you listen to his speech there were a lot more things that were even scarier.

As was expected throughout his whole speech by his teleprompter he played the blame game once again. The state of this union is every bodies fault but his. He blamed everybody from Bush to the judges on the Supreme Court for his failures. It was an arrogant speech, by an arrogant man, of indifference and apathy. The whole speech was a horror show of what the American people can expect in the next three years. It is full steam ahead with his socialist policies and goals no matter what the people want. For a while there he sounded a lot like Castro and Chavez during their speech making and rhetoric. During his speech he said if congress will not pass what he wants then he will sign an executive order. Now to me that sounds like a dictator, want to be, and that should be really scary.

Last year, the American people were told that the huge new federal spending would produce more jobs right away and because of that unemployment would be below 8%.
Just in the last year, over three million Americans have lost their jobs, but yet Obama and the Democratic Congress continues deficit spending, swelling the government, and increasing the national debt on our children and grandchildren and it is still full steam ahead for the Obama administration. We have a do as I say president who is bent on doing what he wants even though it is against the will of the people.

The conditions of our country, right now, mandate that we reestablish the appropriate, role of government at every level. Get rid of the Obama Czars! The unwarranted progression of this (Obama) government threatens our very liberty and prosperity. In recent months, the American people have made clear that they want government leaders to listen and act on the issues most important to them. But Obama has installed czars {who are socialist} to make decisions that will affect our lives and they are not accountable to nobody but him. He will not listen to nobody. With Obama, it is what he wants, not what the American people want. The American people want results, not his rhetoric and lies. Most do not share or want his socialist values.

The American people want their tax dollars used to defeat the Muslim terrorist, but instead it is used to defend them. How crazy is that? People are alarmed and frightened over this administration's attempts to exercise greater power and control over car companies, banks, energy, and health care. The government is gaining more and more control over every aspect of this country and that includes you and me also. Welcome to Obama land!

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Passing The Buck

During the first year of The Obama administration Former President Bush got all the blame for Obama's failures. The buck was passed to him over and over again.. Everything was bush's fault. Who will get the blame in the second year of Obama's administration, for all the things that will go wrong? "TEAM Obama" will have to find another whipping boy { in other words another George Bush} if things continue to go wrong like they have in this past year. Americans are getting tired of Obama passing the buck, and indeed righty so. Obama keeps saying the buck stops with him. If that is the case, when is he going to take the blame instead of passing the buck to Bush? There will be some events that the most devoted "Blame Bush People" cannot convincingly tie to Bush. For instance, here are some things that happen during the last year, that they cannot logically blame on Bush, but in the end if things do not work out they will try to blame the failures on him again. It will be the great teleprompter spin of 2010.

Let us look at the first issue. George Bush did not invent or create the earthquake that destroyed Port-au-Prince and parts of Haiti. Obama can, however, stick what will certainly be a difficult and nasty clean-up attempt on Bush, who, along with Bill Clinton, has volunteered to help raise relief money for the suffering country of Haiti. If chaos, lack of control and disease become the second and third wave of despair in Haiti, The Obama administration will make {In other words pass the buck} Bush and Clinton the fall-guys for His failure to fix Haiti's troubles and {yes} evils. It will be noted by some of the readers, and ignored by many, that Haiti is just about the most corrupt country in the world. If you research the country you will see that Haiti's leaders are right up there along with Chavez and Castro. Haiti's poverty and the hardships of its people was already the worst in the hemisphere, long before the earthquake and guess what: " It had nothing to do with Bush." After saying that I will get plenty of flack I'm sure! But the truth is the truth. All you have to do is read for yourself. That is not to say that we must do all in our power to help the Haitian people during their time of troubles and to help in any way to end the suffering of its people. But in the end they will still have the same corrupt leaders and the hardship and misery that has been a part of that tiny nation for centuries. Once the Haitian people get back on their feet from the devastation of the earthquake they will still have the poverty and hardships they always had.

George Bush did not create the enormous health care bill that is in congress right now. The not so popular legislation has become an huge dead weight around the neck of Democrats, and it is lock, stock and barrel Obama's creation. That is his baby and that of a liberal congress that has allowed him to get this far with the bill. It has become a grab-bag of unconstitutional favors to one group after another to get the bill past and a huge financial hole that will never be filled and one that will always be on the back of the tax payers. The whole way that this health care bill was handled go against everything that Obama said during his campaign about doing things the right way and out in the open for all to see. Despite continued lectures and talks by the Obama and his teleprompter, the American people who have any sense at all – and especially the voters in Massachusetts -- know that this health care bill is a disaster in the making. If the Democrats are successful in passing some sort of watered-down bill, we will witness ongoing strife in congress over efforts to cut Medicare spending. We will see efforts to punish those who do not sign up for insurance, small business people under pressure and stressed to pay for their workers' coverage, and we will also see increasing waiting periods for people who need to see doctors and use health services because millions of Americans will start to take advantage of free medical care all at the same time. It is time for this nation to wake up to the fake transparency of this administration and know exactly where he is trying to take this country.

George Bush is not to blame for Obama's anti-business and narrow-minded off the wall views. The industry and businesses, that are under attack by the Obama administration, will continue to be undecided and troubled about their future and this will lead to the decision-makers of these companies, both big and small, to put off hiring or adding new people. The stimulus bill will kick in some new jobs in the coming months, job growth may still be very poor. The government nor the consumer can provide the spending flow we need to put people back to work; It will take a strong private sector to get this country back on its feet. Anybody with any sense at all knows this. The private sector is necessary and a very important key for this country's future. Obama, the great community organizer, looks at business as the enemy. Big business is his adversary. Obama's buddies at the Justice Department, EPA, Interior Department and in other places are hitting businesses very hard with increased rules and regulations, with warrantless investigations and fees. This is discouraging businesses just when their confidence needs a helping hand and support. No way can Bush be blame for that, although some of the readers of this article will try their best to find him at fault. The Bush Haters will try their best.

It is not George Bush's fault that the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his associates has turned into a show or should we say a three ring circus. It is not his fault that these war crimes are going to be answered for in a civilian court. In spite of the very best efforts of the NYC Police Commissioner Kelly and his whole department, and despite an estimated cost of $215 million in the first year alone, {what a shame} there is, certainly, no doubt that the ridiculous decision to try these terrorists in the most targeted big city, in our country, will prove to be a nightmare and a big worry for the law enforcement agencies of New York City. Let us hope and pray that the only attacks coming from the trials of this terrorist are vocal and not deadly.

It is not because of George Bush that the dictators, or should I say "THE NUT CAKES"} running Iran, North Korea and Venezuela continue to resist President Obama's proposals to them. They may be cruel and evil, but they are not stupid. They can see where Obama is coming from and they laugh. Although our new leader has unclenched his fist, with a lot of magnificent teleprompter speeches, our relations with these nations has not and will not improve, because elegant and well-designed speeches, in front of a teleprompter will not cut it. These countries that are ruled by dictators are facing bankrupt economies and restless and distressed populations; that needs a plan. This the same dilemma that is now all too familiar to Obama. The plan with Obama is: He will keep on trying to pass the buck to George Bush another Year because nothing is never his fault.

Friday, January 22, 2010

The Fall From Grace

This time last year Obama was king of the world. People were calling him the messiah, the savior, and a great man. A year later what has happen to the silver tongue orator? Where has his promised transparently gone or better yet when is it ever going to get here.  His approval rating, according to CBS News, has fell to forty six percent, and his disapproval rating is the highest ever recorded by The Gallup Pole at the beginning of a president's second year. What went wrong with the pied piper?
A year ago, he was leader of a vast liberal superiority in the congress that would last 40 years according to a democrat strategist  James Carville. Just a year ago, conservatism was just about gone, to be heard of no more. A year ago, Obama was the most captivating and charming politician on earth. He was charming the socks off just about everybody. Today the thrill is gone, the doubts about his leadership are growing, even among the one-time believers of the anointed one. Liberals try to point to Obama's decline to him not being tough or hard line enough with challengers. The real reason for today's huge dissatisfaction with Obama, is that he's too far to the left,  So far to the left that he cannot go left anymore without falling off the deep end.
He is the most out of the blue and out-of-nowhere, least-known of all presidents. Obama has the most drastic and far-reaching scary agenda that has ever hit Washington and introduced to congress and to the nation. He wants to reconstruct the American way of life. But the way that is you and me! First with his  with cap-and-trade bill, that, by its self,  is a unparalleled infringement by our government into America’s industry and commerce.  Just like the socialism in other countries. What ever happen to being free. Then, the big one: a health care bill in which the federal government will control one-sixth of the U.S. economy. {unbelievable} Obamacare will turn the health insurance companies into a tool that will serve a useful purpose for him, that being a front for the federal government. The American peoples every move will be dictated  and ordered by government watchdogs who will regulate their every move. At first, health care reform was sustained in the public’s view by Obama's popularity. But then the severity of how bad this would be for the American public took hold, and now Obama care's intense disapproval rating by the public is taking him down with it along with other things. But The health care bill is the most important reason Obama has dropped to 46 percent in the poles. But this reflects and tells the American public of something larger. In the end, what should matter the most to the people is not the personality  or character but the agenda of the person. It was Obama’s personality and pied piper charm that got him elected. Ideas are of importance. Legislative proposals are a matter of substance. The problem is slick campaigns and dazzling silver tongue speeches can only fool the people for a while, but the magic and the charm always wears off in the end. After a while there is no more rabbits to pull out of the hat.
Obama has the honor of being the greatest representative of a political party in recent American history to come to Washington at the midnight hour with a empty vessel.  However, Obama didn't come to Washington just to be someone. He did not come to make things better.  He came to set up a powerful socialist government that would take away our freedoms as we know them and promote big government over our lives.  Obama was groomed all his life for that very purpose and was sent to the White House to do just that. To dismantle this country piece by piece. That is why there is a growing resistance in this country, it is not the man, but it is what he is trying to do to this country. Most Americans will not go along with his radical changes, because we are a free people and so for the next three years the American people will have to put up with things like in the Jimmy Carter era, except a lot worse.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

The Promise From (Obama) The Messiah

All Americans should be concerned and troubled about the course that our government is moving in and the speed in which the President and Congress are attempting to make drastic and far-reaching, in the closet and of a night, changes to this nation and our way of life.

Even though the proposed health care reform bill would not take effect until 2013, the President and the majority of Congress want to rush it through congress without allowing the people of this country the adequate time to read it and completely understand the impact it will have on the lives of the American people. Why so fast? Is faster better? The problem is simply this, The people that we have sent to Washington just do not care what the American people think. They have no regard for the voting public. They look on us and consider us as a people who do not know what they want or what is best for them.

It seems that the goal of our government and the Obama administration is to have complete and absolute power over our lives by chipping away at our freedoms every chance that they can and they are doing just that. They are dismantling our country right in front of our eyes as we stand there {The Silent Majority} and just let it happen. Obama's Attorney General {Eric Holder} has determined the 9-11 terrorists will be tried in a civilian court in New York instead of a military tribunal. Our troops cannot fight a honest winnable war as long as we have a "Heart and Mine Policy" that hampers our troops who are in harm's way. The liberals in Congress are working at a accelerated speed and at a fast pace on legislation to give amnesty to over 12 million illegal immigrants that are now in this country and more coming every day. The government is thrusting a enormous health care bill down our throats that isn't good enough for them, but they want us to be required to use it by law.

The way that this country is headed one day the people of this country will wake up and find that our Constitution has been completely obliterated and we will be living under a new form of government that you can pin one of these names to, socialism, communism, Marxism, Leninism and the last but not the least Obamanism. After all, do not forget Obama promised that "America will not be as we know it." And it is happening right before our eyes. He was not transparent about that { He was very clear on that} and surprise, he did not need a teleprompter when he said it.

Thank goodness for the integrity of the people who voted in the last three state elections, Maybe, after the recent elections in Virginia, New Jersey, and now with Scott Browns big win in Massachusetts people are finally realizing and seeing, what the Obama administration and his socialists cohorts in Congress are trying to do to this country. Americans must take their country back. The next presidential election cannot get here soon enough.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Our Attorney General

We can all remember The Black Panthers intimidation of the voters in Philadelphia during the election of 2008. I wondered what happen to that issue and what was done about it. I was amazed what I found out. The Attorney General {Eric Holder} has refused to prosecute the Black Panthers despite the over whelming evidence against them. WHY? In the most recent string of developments, the House Judiciary Committee voted to stop any action, to not do anything, with the case. Again I ask why? Fifteen Democrats voted to refuse any action on the bullying case while fourteen Republicans voted in the favor of more inquiry into the matter. The House Judiciary Committee voted 15-14, along party lines, not to require the Justice Department to hand over investigative information in the case. What is Holder hiding. Attorney General Holder has obstructed and refused to cooperate with the investigation, and now, it appears that, the Democrats are going along with him and are apparently letting him get away with it. There is no reason why information could not handed over to the committee. I don't think that it was a national security issue. What was the problem?

To most Americans, including myself, this is a very serious case of voter intimidation and bullying. So what is Eric Holder going do, just let them get away with it? I wonder if that would be the case if it was the KKK or a white supremacy group instead of the Black Panthers. Eric Holder may think that this was a small incident, but it does not look that way to me. In all the years that we have had elections there has been only two or three remote cases of voter intimidation but in 2008 there was 48 complaints. This is not a isolated incident. It is a issue that needs to be looked into. Why so many in 2008?
Holder cannot his waste his valuable time on voters being bullied and intimated by thugs with night sticks at the entrance to voting places because as we all know it takes all his time and all his energy for the really
bad guys, like the Navy Seals that will be put on trial, who he is going to prosecute to the full extent of the law for giving a terrorist a bloody nose and denying him his rights under our constitution. {not his}. Is this the way the justice system is going to work in our new Obama land? If it is, something is not right.

There will be no safety for anybody in this country. When you have people in authority that will call what is bad, good and what is good bad, there is something wrong.

After looking at the video, you can see what a charming looking polling place it was. Just look at the video and see for yourself. Soon all of our polling places will look the same and other nice men wielding nightsticks while decked out in steel toed combat boots and black clothes will be stationed at the front door to make sure that only those voters who they allow and approve of feel welcome to take part in the democratic process. But then again , if you remember when the story broke on Fox News it was of course the McCain supporters propaganda and half truths that should be silenced by the Fairness Doctrine which will make sure that everybody has their fair share of free speech, especially if you agree with the democrats. This intimidation goes way beyond all voter fraud. Who will need voter fraud if these guys start hanging around in numbers. The boots of these hard core bullies, at our polling places, are not the Boots on The Ground that we need. If we do not take a stand on this bulling, then the next election it will be that much more worse.

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it!

----------- George Santayana

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Content of The Heart

 As I write this commentary I have no teleprompter or speech writer to write it for me. This is coming from my heart, with much thought of what I write, and from a person that loves this country and the people of all races, all religions, and from all walks of life. Together we make up this great country. Together we can do anything. So if I offend anybody, black or white, as you read this, please forgive me.

I am so spellbound and fascinated by the reason that some black folks voted for Obama and that reason is, "just because he is black", no matter what his polices are or how damaging they could be to this country and the people, no matter what their race is. I thought that discrimination, prejudice, narrow-mindedness, and bigotry, was for the most part, close to being, a thing of the past in this country. We now have the GREAT SOCIETY and that was to make things better for everybody. But the fact is there was no other reason that some people voted for Obama except for the reason, he is black and they were black. I was wrong. We still have people in this country who have a narrow range of opinions and are limited in their outlook and have a narrow, inflexible, view of the real problems facing them. They only see what they want to see. Some liberals say that about me.

In a recent discussion with, a couple, { that are dear friends and always will be, and I will always respect their views}, told me they voted for Obama – and I asked what was their reason that they voted for him. They said to me it was for a 'lots of reasons'.  Then when I asked what the reasons were, they could not give me just one reason why they voted for him.  I mentioned many particular policies and views that we {all three of us} were against, such as abortion, homosexuals, taking God out of schools and government buildings, and many other views that was of importance to our country. I knew that we all agreed on these issues, and the three of us also knew that Obama did not support these views and they said "there are other things besides policies and our personal views." As close friends for years I did not understand what they were saying. I thought that we knew everything about each other. As a final point to the conversation, {because I was shocked and did not understand} I asked the couple this question, 'Was it because he is black that you voted for him? That was the end of the conversation on Obama and it ended with no answer to my question. All the years that we were friends the color of our skin never stood in the way of our friendship or the views and policies that we knew were right for the country and as Christians. I was shocked
the color of the man's skin was the reason they voted for him. I would have never in this world ever thought that they would do that.

Needless to say this couple were and still are true friends. They would give you the shirt off their back and the last dollar that they had. Although, I said all that, I still cannot understand why they voted for Obama. These people were against, just about, everything that Obama stands for. So for my friends, whose parents looked for freedom and liberty in a country that they loved, will soon began to lose that very freedom that their parents fought for and won during the days of that great leader, Martin Luther King, who in my opinion was a just and good man. As he said, He truly did not look at the color of a man's skin, only the contents of his heart. That was a man of character. A man among men who you could look up to. Unlike Obama's so called transparency Dr. King was truly transparent (He was crystal clear in all his words and deeds, There was never any hidden agenda with him.) The man that was elected to the highest office in our land, {Obama}, was voted for by a lot of people, just like my friends, for no other reason other than he is black and by no means for Obama's character or his transparency.

Obama is dismantling our country piece by piece and taking the freedoms we, people of all races, enjoy away from us. It makes no difference if you are black or white. The longer this man is the president of our country the less freedoms we will have and the more the federal government will be our task master. America will be one big plantation and we will all be enslaved to the federal government and its system of big government and it makes no different the color of your skin, your freedoms as you know them today will be gone. That is the "audacity" of hope that Obama promises.

To further prove the point that I'm trying to make, In this article, there was a black lady {who I do not know} that ask my son yesterday if I was a racist and when asked, by my son, why she said that, she told my son that she based the question on the fact that she thinks that I do not like Obama by the articles in my blogs. She was right and she was wrong. She was right in the fact that I do not like or support Obama's agenda of change, but I do not have anything against the man. He was made in God's image the same as I was and I will always respect the office that he holds. I'm no respecter of persons nor will I ever be. It is Obama's policies that I do not agree with and will speak out on.

I want my freedoms, such as a right to own fire arms and not have them taken away by the worst anti gun president ever elected. There are many other issues that I will not go into that puts this man on my list as a bad president, like the peanut farmer from Georgia {the white guy} who nearly done this country in also. I do not hate or dislike Carter as a person, but I do not like what he did to this country when he was president. If Carter was elected to another term we would all be picking peanuts for a living.

She was wrong in the fact that I do not like him because he is a black man. In all my life I have never judged a man or women by the color of their skin. I am no better than anybody else {white or black}. It is the polices of this man that I do not like and in the end most Americans, black and white, will say the same thing. His" audacity of hope" will be gone, along with his fake transparency, and we will all still be looking for that hope of a free nation, less government control over our lives and a better world, but we will be in worse shape.

Here is a Obama alert, let me draw your attention to this – we have got our first black president, but, with him, we will also get the policies that most people and I do not approve of and also the lack of character, transparency, quality, and judgment that that Dr. King had. There is, and never will be, no leadership with this man, only "a hidden agenda " that in the end will en slave this whole country if he is allowed to continue. So much more better if the person, that was elected to the highest office in our land, was someone like Michael Steele, Thomas Sowell, Condi Rice, or people like them, who are white or black, democrat or republican, man or women, poor or rich, as long as their views are true to the founding fathers of this country and the content of their heart is like past leaders such as Martin Luther King or Ronald Regan. Even though there are some that will not agree with me comparing these two great mean, these two men, even though the color of their skin was different, showed through their actions that the content of their heart was the same and they wanted what was best for all Americans and that is to be "FREE" I will be the first to admit that racism in America is alive and well and most certainly if you are going to speak your mind about Barrack Obama. If some citizens are not pleased with the President of the United States {whether he is white of black} they are allowed. If they want to, they can speak their minds and say so. Believe it or not, it doesn't make somebody a racist just because they do not like the direction our country is going. It has nothing to do with the color of the man's skin who is president. It might be his policies. The race or skin color is not important. It's the content of someone's character that matters. It's what is in the person's heart. I am allowed, as an American to disagree with Obama's policies if I want to and that doesn't mean I am racist. That does not mean that I do not like him because he is black. That means we live in a free country that allows decent. That means we are still a free people.

I believe, with all my heart, racism is alive and well in America because of white supremacy groups and many people from the black community. Yes, you read it right, The Black Community. I firmly believe it takes two to keep the ball rolling.

Some black people have got to get over what happened to their people years ago. It was wrong. I'm not asking black people to forget what happened, because to forget it will let it happen again. What I want and most white Americans want is for the black folk to move on and stop making race the issue for all of their problems and we all know there are some that do just that. People like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton get paid, stay rich, and become millionaires over and over again as long racism, in this country, thrives. People, in this country, that preach and think that "white people" are better are WRONG and so are people like Jackson and Sharpton who use the race issue for their gain.

I don't know what else to say about racism except that I am sick and tired of it. We must as Americans move on and realize that if you work hard, and do what's right in your heart to all men no matter what the color of their skin is, eventually your hard work pays off no matter what color you are. It really is very sad what is happening in our country. We live in a society now where to speak out means we get a lashing for something that in most cases isn't even true – we speak out against Obama and we get called racists, hateful, evil, and worse. It is sad, pathetic, and very disturbing – what is most disturbing is that it creates with it a culture of fear and when fear becomes a dominant factor freedom ceases to exist. Just like the silent majority that does not speak out because of fear of being called, " not politically correct".

The majority of the white and black people in this country are not racist and want to go on to better things but there are a minority of white and black people that will keep this issue of race going forever. As long as we have politicians that play the race card for a vote, the KKK, white supremacy groups, the black panthers, The Al Sharptons, The Jesse Jacksons of this world, playing the race card, we will have racism. And by the way if you disagree with me I will not call you a racist. I will call you an American that has chose to not go along with what I said and that is okay, because that is what this country is all about. Freedom of Speech.


Thursday, January 14, 2010

Believe It Or Not

The following Article is a true story and the author, Rick Mathes, is well-known, as a leader in prison ministry.

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in The
United States, especially in the minority races! Last month I attended my annual training session that's required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session there was a presentation by three speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant and Muslim faiths, who explained each of their beliefs. I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Imam gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.

 After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Imam and asked: Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a holy jihad [Holy war] against the infidels of the world and, that by killing an infidel, (which is command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, Can you give me the definition of an infidel?' There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, 'Non-believers!'

I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?' The expression on his face changed from one of authority and command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.' He sheepishly replied, 'Yes.'

I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine Pope John Paul commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!' The Imam was speechless!

I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! Let me ask you a question: Would you rather have your Allah, who Tells You to kill me In order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who Tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be
there with me?' You could have heard a pin drop as the Imam hung his head in shame.

Needless to say, the organizers and/or promoters of the Diversification training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam, and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. To elect the President!
 I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us send it on! This is your chance to make a difference.... FOR GODS' SAKE! SEND THIS ON!

If you research the facts on You Tube and other web pages you will see the article that was written by Rick Mathes is truthful and full of facts. He is not just giving Christians a warning and the facts. He is giving it to everybody whether you are a Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Mormon, or if you have any other way of thinking you are a infidel and you have a mark placed on you by the Muslims. The is no compromise with them,
The article by Mr. Mathes is very interesting and more than just a bit scary because it is the truth ... but the problem is this, is it scary enough to produce something besides talk and political correctness? I'm afraid not because far too many Catholics, Protestants, Atheist, Hindus, Buddhist, and Jews will wait until it hits them upside the head on a very personal level before they will do something besides talk about it. But by then it will be too late. We will all be living in the dark ages, that is if we still have a head on us.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Obama’s War

The military, the defense agencies and intelligence communities have always been skeptical when dealing with Democratic Presidents. Democratic presidential candidates must trash both departments to win the primary votes of liberal activists. They make promises to decrease Pentagon budgets and redirect the spending to domestic programs or better called the pork barrel giveaway programs of entitlement. Obama's win over Hillary Clinton in the primary, and then John McCain in the general election was largely due to his ability to use his rhetoric and teleprompter to express anti-war sentiment and his promise for more entitlement programs.
By the time the presidential campaign was over and Obama won, it was no big secret that the CIA and the defense establishments were pessimist and against many of his more radical and extremist plans. The ones that will allow our enemy to destroy this country. Regrettably, a consequence of this distrust and misgivings is a renewed weakness to Islamic terrorists. Obama alienated and put his self on bad terms with the front line, the boots on the ground. He has a worse relationship with our troops than Bill Clinton did.
Obama's leadership of this country and the troops was not helped by his decision and determination to ignore his meeting with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, {the general, in charge of the troops in Afghanistan,} until almost nine months into his term as president. During this extended period, Obama only spoke with McChrystal only once and that was not face to face but over the phone. This lack of communication was contrary to his campaign promises to listen to our generals. To complex this boo-boo, Obama wasted time. He hemmed and hawed taking his time {months to be exact} to complete a new plan for his Afghan offensive.
Obama also give orders to Attorney General Eric Holder to engage in an reckless examination of the way used to interrogate suspected terrorists after 9/11. The interrogation probe, which is largely seen by many as a witch-hunt against George W. Bush and his administration, is opposed by seven former CIA chiefs from both political parties. Obama openly ignored the warnings of these republican and democrat professionals and has given Holder a free hand to do what he wants. To most Americans this is a big mistake and it will give the Islamic terrorist a big advantage point in the holy war against us.
In December, Obama issued a executive order {13526} which declassified sensitive national secrets, including the daily presidential briefing which were classified. By issuing this controversial executive order, and rolling back precedents set by the Clinton and Bush administrations, Obama is further threatening his relationship with the intelligence community. By revealing sensitive documents, the methods and contacts of U.S. spies become part of the public record. His decision creates a reason for the agencies to hold back and hide information. As you would expect and rightly so, spies never want to appear on the front page of the local newspaper having their decisions bad mouthed by uninformed people who only know what they are told by people like Obama and his followers.
Obama's reaction to the terrorist who was dubbed the underwear bomber by the news media has further strained relations. He condemned what he called "systemic failures" in the CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies for failing to "connect the dots," and announced "he would not tolerate it." This is a classic example of him passing the buck. {but he said the buck stops with him} CIA officials had sent all the appropriate data to the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center in Washington, which was set up after the 9/11 attacks as a clearinghouse where unprocessed data should be examine. As luck would have it, {Being Sarcastic} the Obama administration had planned deep budget cuts for the NCTC before the terrorist attack.
Obama has also met tough opposition in the Pentagon with their refusal to go along with his pipe dream of a nuclear-free world. Obama loves traveling the world over making silver- tongued promises which are very dangerous and unsafe to America. To give a example, Obama wants to unilaterally disarm in the hopes that our enemies follow suit. The second debatable part of Obama's policy is to issue strict guidelines that lay out in detail to the public when the United States would use nuclear weapons. This policy is meaningless because our enemies won't believe our announcements anyway. And, if we do follow these procedures and course of action, we will then be tying our hands and the military to defend this nation. How can anyone really believe that Obama, when he couldn't even get world leaders to agree to a global climate treaty, will be able to convince other nations to do away with their nuclear weapons? That is pure stupidity and lack of common sense on his part.
Barack Obama with his decision-making, his lack of skill and ability, his readiness to put the blame on others, and his not so practicable worldwide view on terror, his pushing away and turning his back on our most important resources, the intelligent agencies, in the universal war on terror and that goes without saying. The bottom line is that this president is willing to sacrifice American lives in order to engage in dangerous policies that are popular only with leftists in this country and leftist all over the world.
Given the fact that we have a president that will not call terrorist what they are: "TERRORIST", a president that has empathy for the terrorist, a president that gives the terrorist rights to our civilian courts, a president who claims that we are a Muslim country should tell us one thing. We are fighting a war against Muslim Terrorist that we cannot win as long as Obama is our leader because he will not allow it.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Come Clean Harry Reid


If Harry Reid is to really come clean about his racial remarks about Obama, he needs to put some of his great leadership into a effort into dismantling the hypocrisy and double standards of race-based attacks from the Democratic Party that Reid himself helped to make. If Harry Reid really wants to get the race issues behind him, he also needs to make an apology to folks like Clarence Thomas who he was quick to degrade and describe as a mental midget.  Reid's vocabulary and his rhetoric, five years ago,  seemed to put forward the idea that Black Americans, such as Judge Thomas, that were unwilling to march to the Democratic way of thinking, were stupid, "embarrassing", and not good enough of holding high positions in the federal government. Reid's substantive criticism of Thomas--if it can be dignified with such a description--turns out to be empty. Sorry Harry this very smart man {Clarence Thomas} is no dummy. I am afraid that anyone hoping to see a honest apology from him and an admission of racial typecasting is going to be very disappointed.  Harry Reid will only support the existing standards, for all intents and purposes, of the racial comments on any Democrat are inexcusable, while, at the same time, Reid and other Democrats will continue policy of a double standard when it comes to their racial comments.

Democrat leaders like Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi are for the most part maintain that only the Republicans (and in particular conservatives) are responsible and guilty of racism and they are the only ones that ever make badly chosen and unbecoming remarks that are demeaning. In the meantime, Black Americans like Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Tomas Sowell, and many other conservative blacks, are attacked and harassed as Uncle Toms and sellouts because, they hold to opinions, ideas, and practices, democrats want you to think that they are not really black at all.  This inherent two faceness is not right and its double standards are wrong. The democrats are just as wrong as any republican. The remarks are the same from both sides of the isle.

As another election year draws near, Harry Reid and his cronies will cry out and attack any Republican that even hints at race, while simultaneously condoning Democratic attempts to demean, to attack, and to disparage any Black American that escapes the Democratic straight jacket of being a loyal vassal and accepting their views. What I'm trying to point out here is, there is a the double-standard with the democrats that no one seems to speak out about or address.

The Crisis

"The federal government spent $3.5 trillion during President Obama's first year in office. Just the first year! This far exceeds the spending for any other first-year president . Obama has blown out of place the budget record for first-year presidents -- spending almost twice as much as his predecessor {George Bush} did when he came into office and far exceeding the first-year tabs for any other U.S. president in history of this country. But yet most democrats are still blaming Bush for the way this country is still in the hole and it is getting bigger all the time.

In fiscal 2009 the federal government {on Obama's watch} spent $3.52 trillion -- which sets a point of reference for comparison to look at. That fiscal year covered the last three-and-a-half months of George W. Bush's term and the first eight-and-a-half months of Obama's.

That price tag came with a $1.4 trillion deficit, nearly $1 trillion more than last year. The overall budget was about a half-trillion more than Bush's for 2008, his final full fiscal year in office. Wow that is a huge difference. That's a big increase. But compared with other presidents' first years in office, Obama is running circles around them spending the tax payer's money.

President Obama announced himself ready to make hard choices to subdue the federal debt. But after spending a trillion dollars to quench the financial disaster, he continue to persist in spending money like nothing had happened. Because of the biggest increase of federal government spending since Medicare: He promises that after health insurance is in the bag and in place for everybody then he insist that we must not forget, a second extraordinary growth of federal power into the economy on behalf of energy development will he then put deficit reduction on the table.

Obama is setting out in his goals to put cost control together with a prize long wanted by his party -- universal health care. He is aware that controlling health-care costs will have need of continuous change, so he wants to put decisions in the hands of a board of experts insulated from politics. I believe the head of these experts are called czars. You know the people that he has put in and were not confirmed by congress.

Both are absolutely terrifying. In the first, Obama merely talks about deficit reduction all the while he is expanding federal spending. Personally I think he is doing it on purpose. In the other side of the story, he promises a miraculous solution from a mixture of specialist who will cut an adequate amount in the cost of health care to cover those new entitlements, He then will package and sell the cuts to congress and the public, and, poof: {like Poof The Magic Dragon} he has magically did nothing, he is one slick dude. He is one big con artist. He should have played in the movie called the "Sting", because he is that good. He could have given Paul Newman and Robert Redford some tips.

All this that he is doing looks just like a movie straight from Hollywood that has gaping holes in the plot.  That, and his magical thinking, which sometimes work for the Hollywood directors, but sorry to say, the health care industry is not a movie. It is the real thing and people's lives are held in the balance. This is something that we, our children, and their children will be paying for plus all the other entitlements that are given out at the tax payer cost by a government that just keeps spending and spending.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Obama’s Heart And Mind Policy

The Obama Administration made a promise to close the Gitmo by January 22, 2010. This is a deadline that he {with all his magic cal powers} will be unable to meet. The ninety one Yemen prisoners in Guantánamo are the largest single group of terrorist held among the nearly two hundred still held. Of the ones already released to Yemen at least a dozen of them have rejoined al-Qaeda, again, to fight Americans. The American public should be concerned with the hundred that will soon be released back to Yemen and that country's ability to control these terrorist with will soon be released.
Six prisoners were returned to Yemen last month. After the Christmas Day bomb plot in Detroit, US officials are increasingly concerned that Yemen is becoming a hot-bed of terrorism.
The country's lay out with its mountainous terrain, poverty and lawless tribal society make it, a close match for Afghanistan as a new terrorist haven. The United States should be concerned about the growing strength of al-Qaeda in Yemen. But their only concern is closing Gito and not using the word terrorist. Most Americans do not want Gitmo closed. A USA Gallup Poll in May 2009 asking the following question and here are the results.

The US Government issued figures in May showing that 74 of the 530 detainees in Guantánamo were known to have returned to terrorist activity since they were release. Included in that figure was the commander of the Tali-ban in Helmand province, Mullah Zakir, who the British officials called "a key and effective tactical leader for the terrorist. Why was this man let go. The number believed to have "returned to the fight" in the May 2009 estimate was double that of a US estimate from June 2008. US officials admit that more detainees from Gitmo have rejoined their terrorist groups since their release, but the number has been keep secret by our government. WHY?
This nation needs to deal with the president and the empathy from liberals that is making that is letting these detainees going back to terrorism.
Government Officials said that a higher percentage of those still being held were likely to return to terrorism because they were considered more of a security threat than those selected in the early stages of the release program. It looks like they are all returning to their old ways. These ideologically committed terrorists simply are not going to listen or do the right thing.

The program, of releasing them back into the general public involves the whole family with a mixture of religious re-education {whatever that is}, patriotism, guilt and co-opting in terms of being given a car, a job and a nice wife." Only in the Islamic world can you be given a wife, - a nice one too. {makes no difference it she wants to marry you or not} Well so much for all those do-goody politically correct idiots, in this country that shouted for the freedom of these prisoners. All these people have done is aid and abet the return of terrorists that would bomb, kill, behead or maim innocent men, woman and children from all walks of life.

These terrorist need to be locked up so they can never hurt anybody again. Obama is the only manmade disaster today, not terrorism, because you have to call that what it is. A act of war against this country by murderous maniacs who put no value on life, only themselves and their so called religion of peace. We do not need to free anymore killers.

Sunday, January 3, 2010


Because of the actions of a few deranged criminals in the past couple of months, beware of the gun control crowd who want to take your guns away. From the gaining, possession, and use of the weapons involved in all of those shootings, every criminal action that took place was and is already illegal and there are laws upon laws on the books to deal with these criminals, but despite all these laws, there will be some power-hungry politician who will try to get re-elected and get more free television time by calling for yet another new gun law. Stay tuned to the boob tube and you will see! The liberal gun control nuts just can't understand or realize that CRIMINALS don't really care about laws and If they don't care about such laws as MURDER, ROBBERY, ASSAULT, and others, what makes the liberal gun control crowd think the criminals care about GUN CONTROL laws? The liberals will never get it. The honest man does not stand a chance.

Obama and his Attorney General have already made their positions on gun control and public individual gun ownership. They are against it. While serving in the Illinois legislature, the President fought hard for legislation to take away the 2nd amendment rights of Illinois residents. This is one piece of legislation that he never voted present on. Before the Washington, DC v Heller Supreme Court decision was handed down in June, 2008), both men said the states (and Washington, DC) should have the right to ban and make illegal individual gun ownership. There is no doubt that before the Obama's' first term ends, his administration, and his czars will take some action to deny and refuse Americans their 2nd amendment rights to own guns. It is coming. There is a new firearms bill {H.R. 45} that sets up tracking of gun owners and their guns. this has many gun owners up in arms. This bill is a federal requirement that would supposedly force gun owners to list their firearms on their federal income tax returns. But while the bill, without a doubt, puts in place wide sweeping gun-control measures {including one that would prohibit citizens from owning a gun without a license} the income tax provision, according to the latest from, doesn't exist, {yet} The Blair Holt Firearms Bill {H.R. 45} was introduced Representative Bobby Rush, a liberal Democrat from Illinois. While the bill does not include provisions about reporting guns on federal tax forms, it does contain several gun-control proposals that are drawing angry disapproval from gun owners. If passed this bill {HR-45} would stop any person from owning any handgun or semiautomatic firearm that accepts a detachable ammunition feeding device, {in other words a clip} without obtaining a license from the federal government. This bill {H.R. 45} is flawed in that it focuses on the guns used in the crime rather than on the criminals who use the guns. And further this Bill would turn law-abiding citizens into violators of the law. If these liberals would focus just as hard on the criminals as they do the fire arms crime would go way down in this country.

Under this law, a person who is wants a firearm license must give to the attorney general of the United States an application with the following information: (1) current passport-sized photo (2) name, address, date and birthplace (3) any other name the applicant has used (4) a clear thumb print (5) a statement that the individual is not a person prohibited by federal or state law from obtaining a firearm (6) certification that the applicant will keep the firearm safely stored and out of the possession of minors (7) certificate showing applicant has passed a written firearms examination on the safe storage of firearms, safe handling of firearms, use of firearms in the home and risks associated with use, legal responsibilities of firearms owners and "any other subjects, as the Attorney General determines to be appropriate" (8) authorization to release "to the Attorney General or an authorized representative of the Attorney General any mental health records pertaining to the applicant" (9) the date on which the application was submitted, (10) and the applicant signature.

Licensed dealers would be required to submit to the attorney general or the proper state authorities the following information within 14 days of a transfer of a qualifying firearm: (1) manufacturer (2) model name or number (3) serial number (4) date of transfer (5) number of the transferee's valid firearm license (6) name and address of person who transferred the firearm. Within nine months of the bill's passage, the attorney general would be required to establish and maintain a federal system to track sales, including all of the identifying information submitted during a transfer of ownership. Under H.R. 45, it would be illegal to fail to report lost or stolen firearms or to fail to report change of address within 60 days of the change.

To ensure compliance with the act, the attorney general would be authorized to "enter any place in which firearms or firearm products are manufactured, stored or held, for distribution in commerce, and inspect those areas where the products are so manufactured, stored, or held." This act is not relevant to or for government authorities. {they are above the law}, but law-abiding Americans that have the right to keep and bear arms are not. (We don't have to be in a militia to own and keep guns.) This bill, however, would treat those citizens who exercise their rights to own a gun like criminals." The bills centers its attention primarily on guns as the instruments and cause of crime instead of punishing the criminals who commit illegal acts, with firearms, that are against the law. The way this bill has been put forth it makes law-abiding citizens violators of the law.

Several provisions in this bill would make compliance nearly impossible. {That is what the federal government wants} For instance, the bill spells out that if a firearms license holder fails to notify the Attorney General of an address change within 60 days, that person would be subject to a 5-year prison term and a fine of up to $250,000." The government wants to make you a criminal if you own a firearm. Any kind of bill that would require photographing and fingerprinting for simple possession of a firearm is fundamentally different in the fact that any law should target the criminal element, but this law would simply further burden and put a yoke around law-abiding people." Do you think that criminals are going to abide by this law?

This legislation is too far-reaching and repressive to become law. American gun owners are tired of their rights being denigrated and destroyed Any politician who votes for this bill or any bill of this type should be remembered and voted against when they come up for re-election. There are so many existing gun laws that do nothing to stop or restrain criminals. History and statistics both prove that such bills are destructive to the citizens of this country. If this bills' purpose is to truly 'protect the public against the unreasonable risk of injury and death' then the Congress should realize that the only threats to the public are from the criminal element that this bill will not address, and from the government itself.
"With Guns, We Are ”Citizens”. Without Them, We Are “Subjects."

Saturday, January 2, 2010


At the very beginning, before I say anything else, let me make the necessary statement to give acknowledgements that is due to the very early Islamists. The early Islamist had a major role in the developing the civilization of their day. Mathematics, medicine, astronomy, geography and Arabic numbers was some of the things that influenced people in their day and time-- and beyond. But that was way back then, and this is now, the present. Back then there were no Afghans to racially imprison, no tall buildings, like the Twin Towers to blow up and no passenger jets to hijack or blow up; there were no embassy in Kenya, no USS Cole, no subway systems in Great Britain and Spain; no night clubs in Bali and Germany, no Americans to behead, no more dead bodies of Americans to hang on bridges for the world to see, and the United States was not yet putting billions of dollars into their hands, not least of all to supply the technology that has made Muslim dictatorial families the wealthiest in the world – sitting on bath room toilets with gold seats, while the people starve in the streets. Most, if not all, Islamic countries are 3rd world countries.

The fact is the Islamic religion that was a important role in the development of early society has been taken over by crazed, ego, maniacal madmen called mullahs and ayatollahs, among who it can be argued and pointed out, based on the historical record, Muhammad was founder and chief, he was that and much more.

These Islamic madmen can promote and put forward any crazy belief or reason they want for their cruel and brutal behavior and people of this world can buy into it if they want. The question is what would this earth be like if they ruled it? Would the bombings, beheadings, murders and mutilations of children be part of their world view? Would kidnapping and ceremonial beheadings exampled by Muhammad be part of their laws? Scary thought.

Can we assume by their conduct and butchering of innocent men, women and children in the middle east that this is their idea of jumping into the 21st century with liberties and freedoms for all? Is this their way of accepting and embracing democracy? Yes it is!

Or should we look to Afghanistan, where women, at one time, were students and professionals before Taliban Muslims took over in 1994? Is the brutal oppression that women experienced under the Taliban's so called refined and warm religion what the women of this world wish for and desire? Where are their {The Taliban's} Margaret Thatchers and Condoleezza Rices? There are none. Here is the big follow up question. Would Barbara Streisand, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer or Nancy Pelosi be able to promote their views against such a leadership? I don't think so!

Looking at the six or more years of Taliban rule in Afgannistan , what would we dare imagine or think if a religion whose leaders killed men for such things as wearing their beards too short were to take over the middle east? They almost have! Does anyone think they would be satisfied with that? Based on the last seven centuries, what could we visualize if they took over all of the world? With these people you have the most rigid set of rules of what people can do, what they cannot do and what they can think." The "Wahhabists" have assumed and taken over the peaceful religion of Islam and replaced the peaceful religion with a preaching of " violent behavior, carnage, brutality, slavery, and cruelty. We see it every day, more so, even in America.

They have supporters all over the world. And the worst of those are the Muslims themselves. The peaceful Muslims will not even stand up and say enough is enough. In every country that permits them entrance and a way in, radical Muslims make an attempt to undermine and weaken the lawful government. They can point to nothing but oppression, murder and a unorthodox form of Islam. Yet we have politicians, in this country, defending them and newspapers praising them. What is wrong with this picture? The turnip truck must have went by and they fell out on their heads.

The question has to be asked: if these deep-seated fundamental Muslim terrorists refuse a free society in their country what about the middle east, The United States and the rest of the world? As a group born with the idea that they should rule the world, what could be expect of them besides all the men not being able to shave and wearing towels for caps. The women would be wearing garments that look like burlap bags that covered all of them except for their eyes and they could go nowhere unless a man was with them. The women would be goners if they were ever raped. Read some of the overseas newspapers.

Based on the most available and latest examples of their governmental rudeness and cruelty can we take for granted that Malik Nadal Hasan and Abdul Mutallab are illustration and patterns of their domestic and foreign diplomacy? But have no fear because we can rest securely in the wide spread belief, among the American public, that our great Mahdi { The Islamic belief of a prophet or messiah who is expected to appear in the world sometime before it ends } will save us, just as soon as he gets back from Hawaii and can find time in his very busy vacation schedule?
                WITH GUNS WE ARE CITIZENS,

Friday, January 1, 2010


The big question for the year 2010 is this: "Is the U.S. government serious about the most important job of protecting Americans from the extreme violence and bloodshed of Islam fascism and Muslim terrorist – or is it going to take another wakeup call like 911 were thousands of Americans were murdered"?

Why does our president, the government, and the news media seem so ignorant, unaware, and blind to the widespread infiltration by Islamic radicals in this country and the jihad that has happen in 2009 right here on American soil?
The has been more terrorist incidents in the year 2009
than the three previous years together.

Why do you think, whenever there is a terror attack on American soil, the FBI always announces right away – before they, or anybody else, could possibly know – that the jihad on American soil is not terror-related? How do they know before even getting the facts, before they have all the facts and clues? Why do they always say this?

Why does the news media dream up and put together the most stupid and dumb explanations for terrorism – such as the Time magazine point the finger at post traumatic stress disorder for Hasan's Fort Hood murderous rampage (even though he was never with the army in any war zone to have any stress) or the Associated Press outlook on the mass murders when they said that the shooter was "lonely" and without a friend? Or why did the press develop , at least, six different theories to explain the time of terror the Beltway sniper John Muhammad caused, but not one mentioned jihad as a likely reason? You can put the news media in the same category as people with major learning problems. They will never learn. With all their capabilities, resources, and skills they cannot see what is happening right before their eyes. Are they blind? And we, as Americans depend on these news sources for accurate and truthful news reporting. SEE NO - HEAR NO - SPEAK NO - JIHAD

Why  does President Obama take every chance and opportunity, he gets, to criticize America and then go all over the world to praise Islam, even calling America "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world" {when it is not}
and bowing reverently and admiringly before the Muslim king of Saudi Arabia? What kind of a statement does this make to the world and to our jihad enemies. All this while he is putting down the country he is president of.

Why does Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano, demonize pro-lifers and try to make them to appear evil or threatening in the eyes of others , and
calling returning war veterans a
Tim McVeigh wannabes. She causes these people to appear evil or threatening in the eyes of the American public. Why has she appointed to her advisory council Kareem Shora, who is the national executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, whose officials have branded and put a label on the deadly anti-U.S. jihadists calling them "heroes" and opposed referring to Hamas as a terrorist and villain organization. Why do we have someone in a advisory position that call people heroes who wants to destroy this country? This is who Janet Napolitano seeks advice from.

Why has The Department of Homeland Security, that was created, after the Sept. 11 Islamic terror attacks
to defend this nation, radically shifted its focus during the Obama administration
telling police across America to watch out for "right-wing extremists" – especially returning war veterans – people who support the Second Amendment {the right to own fire arms}, those opposing abortion and illegal immigration, and promoting U.S. sovereignty and the Constitution.

Why did The U.S. Army paid no attention to a stack of factual { obvious} warning signs that the Muslim terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan was a brainwashed, America-hating jihadist, yet the army did absolutely nothing to stop him or the Fort Hood massacre of dozens of American soldiers.

Why will the 911 terrorists {who are combatants of war against this country} be tried in civilian court in New York City, offering these well known and self confessed terrorists our civilian courts and a worldwide stage they crave and want so bad from which they can spread their ideology, and also by having a civilian trail this government will be opening up America's -war secrets on terror to discovery by the terrorists through their lawyers – all paid for by taxpayers. Why is this happening? SEE NO - HEAR NO - SPEAK NO JIHAD

Why is this present administration closing Gitmo and sending scores of terrorist back to Yemen when that country is getting more and more radical every day? Yemen is a Islamic terrorist's paradise and our government is sending these people back there so they can rain terror down on us again. Sometimes, with this government, one plus one does not add up to two. SEE NO - HEAR NO - SPEAK NO JIHAD

Why are there dozens of Islamic terror training camps operating right under the nose of the FBI, law enforcement, and the government, not in some far-off land, but all across the United States of America!
Mosques and Islamic centers in the U.S. are actively teaching jihad ideology and paramilitary training in the U.S. It is a documented fact that these people, at best, are armed and dangerous. They are doing paramilitary training right here in this country. There are between 400 to 500 radical Islamic centers in the U.S. In these places, they preach and teach a extreme and fanatical version of Islam that says America and the West is the enemy. They support and promote violence, hatred and the need for terrorism.
The largest of these places
is situated on 70 acres located in a remote and heavily secluded area on the western edge of the Catskill Mountains in New York state, about 40 miles southeast of Binghamton, NY
. Why is our government letting this happen in our own country? SEE NO - HEAR NO - SPEAK NO - JIHAD

What is going on here? Does our government really care about this nation's security anymore or is it that to be politically correct our leaders must


From a California school teacher….. As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things ...