Monday, September 27, 2010

President's Socialist Takeover Must Be Stopped

The Washington Times -------  President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.

He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.

He has abused his office and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. His health care overhaul was rammed through Congress. It was - and remains - opposed by a majority of the people. It could only be passed through bribery and political intimidation. The Louisiana Purchase, the Corn husker Kickback, the $5 billion Medicaid set-aside for Florida Senator     Bill Nelson - taxpayer money was used as a virtual slush fund to buy swing votes. Moreover, the law is blatantly unconstitutional: The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a goods or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power.

Yet Obama Care's most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children. This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens. Traditionalists - evangelicals, Catholics, Baptists, Orthodox Jews - have been made complicit in an abomination that goes against their deepest religious values. As the law is implemented (as in Pennsylvania) the consequences of the abortion provisions will become increasingly apparent. The result will be a cultural civil war. Pro-lifers will become deeply alienated from society; among  many, a secession of the heart is taking place.

Mr. Obama is waging a frontal assault on property rights. The BP oil spill is a case in point. BP clearly is responsible for the spill and its massive economic and environmental damage to the Gulf. There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia's Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda. Billions will be dispensed arbitrarily in compensation to oil-spill victims - much of it to Democratic constituents. This is crony ism and creeping authoritarianism.

Mr. Obama's multicultural socialism seeks to eradicate traditional America. He has created a command-and-control health care system. He has essentially nationalized the big banks, the financial sector, the automakers and the student loan industry. He next wants to pass "cap-and-trade," which would bring industry and manufacturing under the heel of big government. The state is intervening in every aspect of American life - beyond its constitutionally delegated bounds. Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper.

To provide the shock troops for his socialist takeover, Mr. Obama calls for "comprehensive immigration reform" - granting amnesty to 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens. This would forge a permanent Democratic electoral majority. It would sound the death knell for our national sovereignty. Amnesty rewards lawlessness and criminal behavior; it signifies the surrender of our porous southern border to a massive illegal invasion. It means the death of American nationhood. We will no longer be a country, but the colony of a global socialist empire.

Rather than defending our homeland, Mr. Obama's Justice Department has sued Arizona for its immigration law. He is siding with criminals against his fellow Americans. His actions desecrate his constitutional oath to protect U.S. citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. He is thus encouraging more illegal immigration as Washington refuses to protect our borders. Mr. Obama's decision on this case is treasonous.

As president, he is supposed to respect the rule of law. Instead, his administration has dropped charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. This was done even though their menacing behavior was caught on tape: men in military garb brandishing clubs and threatening whites at a polling site. A Justice Department lawyer intimately involved in the case, J. Christian Adams, resigned in protest. Mr. Adams says that under Mr. Obama, there is a new policy: Cases involving black defendants and white victims - no matter how much they cry for justice - are not to be prosecuted. This is more than institutionalized racism. It is an abrogation of civil rights laws. The Justice Department's behavior is illegal. It poses a direct threat to the integrity of our democracy and the sanctity of our electoral process.

Corruption in the administration is rampant. Washington no longer has a government; rather, it has a gangster regime. The Chicago way has become the Washington way. Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel is a political hit man. He is an amoral, ruthless operator. It was Mr. Emanuel who reached out to Rep. Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania Democrat, offering a high-ranking job in the hopes of persuading Mr. Sestak to pull out of the primary against Sen. Arlen Specter. It was Mr. Emanuel who offered another government position to Andrew Romanoff to do the same in the Colorado Democratic Senate primary. And it was Mr. Emanuel - as the trial of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has revealed - who acted as the go-between to try to have Valerie Jarrett parachuted into Mr. Obama's former Senate seat. The only question was: What did Mr. Blagojevich want in exchange?

This is not simply sleazy Chicago machine politics. It is the systematic breaking of the law - bribery, attempt to interfere (and manipulate) elections using taxpayer-funded jobs, influence peddling and abuse of power.

The common mis-perception on the right is that Mr. Obama is another Jimmy Carter: an incompetent liberal whose presidency is being reduced to rubble under the onslaught of repeated failures. The very opposite, however, is true. He is the most consequential president in our lifetime, transforming America into something our Founding Fathers would find not only unrecognizable, but repugnant. Like all radical revolutionaries, he is consumed by the pursuit of power - attaining it, wielding it and maximizing it. Mr. Obama's fledgling thug state must be stopped.

If Republicans win back Congress in November, they should - and likely will - launch formal investigations into this criminal, scandal-ridden administration. Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has promised as much. Mr. Obama has betrayed the American people. Impeachment is the only answer. This usurper must fall.
Jeffrey T. Kuhner is a columnist at The Washington Times and president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington think tank. He is the host of "The Kuhner Show" on WTNT 570-AM ( ) from 5 to 7 pm. SOURCE:  KUHNER: President's socialist takeover must be stopped - Washington Times


Saturday, September 25, 2010

How Do I Feel About Gun Control?

I'm sorry but I guess, as Obama said, I'm one of those people who cling to their guns and Bible and proud of it. People ask me the question all the time: "How do I feel about gun control?" The answer to that is: “ Break into my house one night and find out!” If Bruce and Sammy don't get you first Then you will have the chance to meet Buck (Short for 00 Buckshot!) or Mr. Glock. The country road that I have lived on since 1986 has turned from a quite neighborhood that you could leave your doors unlocked and keys in the car with no one ever bothering the car or coming into your house, to a place where in just a few short years crime is becoming the main stay. Robbery, shootings, assaults, drugs, breaking and entering, and even murder is the normal things that happen here now, on this once quite country road. The peace and tranquility that was once here is no longer.

That may sound out of place, and “Politically Incorrect” to some of you liberals and anti gun people, but let me tell you of two instances that people have tried to break into my house and what took place, then you can go from there with your thinking.

In the first instance I was in my bedroom, in bed, one night about two years ago when someone [more than one] tried to get into my house through the sliding glass door in my bedroom.
I was woke up out of a dead sleep, but I already had a plan in place as to what I would do if this ever happen, so I put part one of my plan into action. I grabbed my pump shotgun, that I keep by my bed [ the one with the short barrel and pistol grip and loaded with 00 buckshot] I picked up the phone and said, without dialing, in a loud voice: “I JUST SHOT SOMEONE FOR BREAKING INTO MY HOUSE, Then I pumped a shell into the chamber of the shotgun. The intruders heard the sound of the shotgun as I pumped a shell into the chamber [That is a pretty scary thing] and my voice saying [Like I was calling the police] that I just shot somebody for breaking into my house. They jumped off the deck and run for their lives and are still running. I got the plans for what I did from a movie that I watched years ago with Julia Roberts called “Sleeping with the enemy”. I was safe and no one was hurt. It worked. No one was hurt, shot or injured.

There was a part [B] to my plan and that was this: once they heard the shot gun being pumped and what I said over the phone and if they still wanted to break in then they would truly have met Mr. Buck and Mr. Glock who would have sent them to met their maker. If the intruders still wanted to break into my house after hearing my voice and the shot gun being pumped then they knew what the next step would be! BANG! BANG! BANG! So it was their decision to what they wanted to do, run while they had the chance or get shot. They had a choice. This time they made the right choice.

In the second instant I was in my living room and the dogs growled and then some one just tried to break the door in. There was no trying to jimmy the lock, they were breaking the door down. At that time I was in business and my office was located in my house. I never kept any money in the house to speak of {if that was what they were after} but I guess the intruders thought other wise. There was no time to call the police, I had a 40 caliber Tarsus automatic in the coffee table drawer and I took it out and yelled for them to go away, but they still tried to break the door in. I shot through the house next to the door. Once again the intruders ran away. But like in the first instants the next thing would be if they never run they would have met their maker.

I have thought many times about relocating but I believe no matter where you go a person can or will have the same problem. I will always say that the government and our court system is a big part of this growing problem on my country road and this country as a whole. I always believed that if you do the crime, then you must do the time. But this is not so anymore. If I would have shot anybody when they tried to break in I most likely would have been the one in trouble with the law. That is just the way it is these days. I personally believe That a well armed citizen is the best deterrent to crime and mayhem in this country. The problem is Obama and his liberal friends want to take them from us. The government can pass all the laws they want [besides the hundreds that are on the books already] and the only people that will have no guns is the law abiding people who want just to defend their rights. Remember this, the criminal element will always have guns because they do not abide by the law in the first place. And if they did not have guns to commit their crimes it would be knifes or anything that they could use to commit their act of lawlessness.

The government would have rather for me to have run into another room in my house and call the police. Here is what would have happen. I would have been robbed, shot, injured, or worse. The police always do the best job that they can but it would have taken them [from where I live] at least twenty minutes, or longer, to respond to any call that I made for help. By that time it could have been all over for me. The question that I want to ask and would like comments on is this: “WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE?”

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Who Are The Extremists? - you decide!

I have noticed, a lot lately, the persistent efforts of the establishment (that includes the some established Republicans as well as the left) to portray mainstream conservatives, especially those who are in the tea-party movement, as radicals and extremists. The sad fact is the more they push this message, the more they marginalize themselves from mainstream America. The establishment is losing their touch, so who are the extremist?
We all remember when Obama's Defense Department released a manual distinguishing protests" as a form of low-level terrorism and characterizing them as such. Obama's Department of Homeland Security issued a report characterizing protesters as potentially dangerous right-wing extremists and racists, being sure to slander disgruntled veterans returning from duty overseas as part of that frightful mix. Also unforgettable is Obama's flat out disrespect of small-town people who he classified as bitter people clinging to their guns and Bibles. We all can (I know I can) learn a lot about people from what they like and do not like. These people including, Obama, bring out a great deal about themselves when they call people who are patriotic Americans, extremists and bitter people. The people who believe in;

  • The rule of law– that is to govern this land, applied to all people not just for the benefit of certain people.

  • Lower taxes- by less government spending and putting more money in the tax payers pocket.

  • Balancing the budget - by doing away with a lot of entitlement programs for people who want to use the system and doing away with all the pork projects.

  • A strong national defense– not a strong offense! Not bowing to heads of other nations, not calling terrorism a made made disaster, but calling it is what it is and that is an attack against a free nation.

  • Limited government– no czars, doing away with about half the federal agencies that we have now and stream line the ones that are left.

  • The Second Amendment- No gun control for honest law abiding people. Just stiff prison terms for people that use guns to commit crimes. It is sad when the home owner or store owner gets into more trouble shooting an armed burglar than the burglar.

  • The free market- Stop burdening small businesses with taxes, fees, rules and so many regulations that they can no longer compete

  • Protection of unborn babies-stop killing unborn babies that have no way of protecting their self. Give unborn babies the same rights are we give dangered species of animals in this country.

  • People who believe in law and order- if you do the crime you are going to do the time.

  • Protecting our borders - Stopping illegal immigration and the terrorist that are coming across our borders. Put the man power there that is needed to stop it and remove the illegals that are here now.

  • All men are created equal– no matter what your skin color is you are an American and you are a equal in all things.

  • And yes we can not leave out “ THE APPLE PIE
That just about sums up what and who the tea party people are in my view. That is not extremists. They are just about American as you can get! If you were to research the facts you would find that there are just about two times as many American voters who say they are conservatives than people who say they are liberals, and conservatives mostly believe in those things that are listed above. So how are they extremist?Tea party protesters are not extremists, they are peaceful people. The only time you see or hear of any violence at any of their protests or rallies is when liberals send in their union hoods to stir up trouble or to camouflage their selfs as conservative people who are there. The only time you'll hear about racism at one of the Tea Party events is when leftists and liberals play the race card and manufacture events. The problem with this is there is a abundance of all races at the Tea Party events. If a person listens to Nancy Pelosi she says that she was "very happy" with the elections results because they showed that extremists in the tea-party movement are dominating Republican primaries. She has no clue! She has fell off that turnip truck years ago. This is a person who is a leader and law maker in this country! Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski said in her concession speech, following her defeat, that the Republican Party has been "hijacked by the Tea Party Express”, which she called an outside extremist group. Oh really, Senator Murkowski, the Tea Partier are extremists. How do you get that?
Obama is utterly insulting to most of the American people about their explicit wishes. About the path that this country should take. That is because he is a big time narcissist. He is, always, entirely overbearing in his answer to the objections by the people to most of his agenda that he has put in place. When the majority of the American people rejected his health care bill, he did not care about what they wanted. Obama didn't say, "I hear you loud and clear, my fellow Americans." He did not and still does not care what the people think or want. It makes no difference to him because it is what he wants, forget about the American people! It is like he is the supreme ruler and what he says is it. We the people have no say with him. He has been on TV and been on more vacations than any American president before him. Is he a movie star or our president? Look at the failure of his stimulus package. Where did all that money go because it sure did not help our economy. We are no better off now than before it was passed. Now he wants another stimulus when the first one did not help. So please tell me who is more extreme? Is it our new ruler (King Obama and his enablers) who are;

Monday, September 20, 2010

The Witch Hunt Is On!

The elections are close and the witch hunt is on! Bill Maher's release of remarks (on witchcraft) made by Christine O'Donnell, who has cast herself as a conservative with Christian values, puts her in an ill-chosen position. But she has given a very good and believable account of what she said. On Sunday she summed up her experiment in sorcery to being a teenager, and she said this: “ there is no magical explanation to her 1999 confession that she "dabbled into witchcraft." She didn't doing anything differently than lots of kids at that age, But there's been no witchcraft since.”
How does a reader, a voter, and a person deal with this type of revelation? First we must see what that person stands for now, not what they did when they were a teenager in school. We all know that when we went to school some did things that were really questionable and there was a lot of dumb things done also. All teenagers will experiment with different things such as alcohol, smoking, drugs, sex, pranks, and many other things such as witchcraft.Everyone has skeletons in their closet...especially from teenage years. But what do those same people as adults do now? Some have gone on with what they did in high school and others have chose a different way. Christine O'Donnell has said that she has chosen a different way and the voters of Delaware have a choice to accept or not accept her explanation.It's pretty sad that the press had to go all the way back to high school to look for dirt. If they did that for everyone who ran for office - no one would ever get elected. Let's hear her ideas for governing today not what she did when she was 18.A person could ask their self what did Bill Mair do when he was in high school? Does he have a right to cast a stone or does he, like most America,ns live in a glass house? If we judged all elected officials by their past how many would be elected? I dare say not many!
I was brought up to believe and was taught that Jesus Christ came to save and to forgive sinners. That goes for all of you who decide to use it against her. But remember, what mercy you give her, the same will be meted out to you. If we were perfect, Jesus would not have had to die on the cross for all of us. Yes, all of us, that means you and me. There is nobody that should deny that.
Bill Maher is a liberal so he is doing what he always does. If liberals cannot get their way, then they make personal attacks against their opponent . If you are losing, make personal attacks. It is the same thing every election year and it will always be that way. The " president " was a doper while in college, he hung around with radicals and still does, but we hear nothing from Mr. Maher about those things. We could say personal things about a lot of liberals and conservatives that has happen in their past. But we must look at the issues and how they as a candidate stand on them.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Making The Right Choice

Have you ever listen to Obama when he is trying to make policies about how things should be done he keeps reminding people that the buck stops with him, but when he is criticized about his policies then it becomes Bush's fault. He would then try to make you believe that the buck stopped with Bush. Which is it? As a registered independent I always look at both sides of the issue and with the mid term elections coming soon, we really need to make good choices who we want to represent us. The voters will hear that all the massive deficits that we now have was left by Bush and the Republicans and Obama inherited them. Have they fell off the turnip truck? You can believe that line of thinking if you want to, but it is far from being the truth. If you take time to look into and scrutinize what has happen then you will see that would be far from the real truth.

Although Bush was the president we must remember that democrats controlled both sides of congress before Obama (the yes we can man), became president. The massive deficit was created by the democrats and guess who else! Barrack Obama was at the time a United States senator from Illinois. If you look closer you will see he was and still is one of the biggest spenders of our tax dollars. He has been trying to spread the wealth around for years. With Obama in the White House, with his comrades, Reid and Pelosi this nations deficit is larger than it has been in fifty years and the democrats are still spending what they do not have. A lot of voters had hope when they elected Obama there would be a change. They liked the words “ TRANSPARENTCY” and “CHANGE” Since Obama has taken office there has been no transparency and for the majority of hard working Americans it was not the change they wanted to see.

In one of his famous speeches Obama said " The worst thing we could do is to go back to the very same policies that created this mess in the first place," Remember him saying that? That is about the only thing that I can agree with Obama on. If we are going to talk about "the policies that created this mess in the first place," let's at least get the facts straight and the names right. The current policies of the Obama administration are a continuation of the same reckless policies that brought on the current economic problems, in the first place, all in the name of "change."

If this nation is to survive then there really does have to be a change. We must get rid of both republicans and democrats that direct and route huge sums of our tax dollars where it will do them the most good, personally (in there pockets) or helping them to buy their votes in the next election to keep them in power. It saddens me why we have a issue with illegal immigration, when it should never be in the first place. The democrats will do nothing because they want the illegals vote and the republicans will do nothing because they want the cheap labor. This leaves the tax payer holding the bag. It is a time to put a stop to the way our government, as a whole, operates. Most of the people in congress do not represent the American people anymore.

It is time to send our leaders in the nations capital a clear message and elect people who will do the right thing, people who will strive to balance the budget, people who will put a stop to illegals coming into this country, people who will stand tall and not bend to terrorist, people who will give this country back to the American people, people who are trust worthy and honest, people who have America's interest at heart.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010


The Original And The Modern Versions  
MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!
The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.
Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving.
CBS, NBC , PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.
America is stunned by the sharp contrast.
How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?
Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper and everybody cries when they sing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green.'
ACORN stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the group singing, "We shall overcome." Then Rev. Jeremiah Wright has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper’s sake.
President Obama condemns the ant and blames President Bush, President Reagan, Christopher Columbus, and the Pope for the grasshopper's plight.
Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share..
Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.
The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government Green Czar and given to the grasshopper.
The story ends as we see the grasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house,  crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn't maintain it.
The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again.
The grasshopper is found dead in a drug- related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and once peaceful, neighborhood.
The entire Nation collapses bringing the rest of the free world with it.
MORAL OF THE STORY Be careful how you vote in 2010!

Monday, September 13, 2010

Tolerance – or is it appeasement

During the past decade or more our country has been under attack by a people who claim to be holy, who in the name of their god (Allah) have beheaded, killed, murdered, and maimed thousands upon thousands of people in our country and around the world. The response to these actions by our government is one of appeasement. The government of our land calls it tolerance but it is appeasement, plain and simple. The president and government officials call for tolerance when it comes to these Islamic terrorist and their religion of hate. I decided to research this word that we hear so much anymore and this is what I have found that the word tolerance means;

  • Forbearance- which means patience and clemency

  • Toleration – which mean moderate and merciful

  • Impartiality – which means fairness and unbiased

  • Compassion – Which means pity, concern, sympathy

  • Magnanimity - which means forgiveness, charitable, unselfish

The question that has to be asked is this: How can any of the above meanings apply to a people that hate everything about your, and my, country and always will. How can these words be applied to a group of people who killed and maimed for life thousands of innocent people at the two world trade centers, who killed hundreds of our marines in their barracks in Beirut? We can all remember the USS Cole, and the soldiers killed at Fort hood Texas. All of theses vicious acts was done in the name of their god.
When a poisonous snake tries to bite you, you cut off the snakes head, when a raging lion tries to attack and kill you, you kill it before he kills you! A person does not have pity or concern for the snake or lion and that is the same way it should be for people that try to kill us everyday. You do not feed the lion or let the snake keep biting. You put a stop to it.
This country is at a cross roads and with the present administration the future of our country does not look very good. We are on a slippery slope. Obama does not want to call the terrorist what they really are, instead he calls their dastardly deeds “made made disasters” which to most people is a joke. Sometimes we must wonder whose side he is on just by what he says and does in public. For instants;

  • Obama said that we should have compassion for the Muslim people. A My question is how much compassion is enough? When does sympathy and pity come to a end? We given in to these people more and more everyday. Now there is a time and a place when enough is enough. How do you have compassion on people that want to kill you? We must remember, and keep in mind, that not all Muslims are terrorist or radicals and we must not blame all Muslims for all the killings and beheading of our people. But the question, we have to ask is this, If Islam is a peaceful religion then why have the peaceful Muslims not stood up and condemned these acts of violence? Why have they not put their own house in order? Mr. president answer that question!

  • Obama said that we are no longer just a Christian nation. B During a trip to Egypt Obama made that very statement. Were they words of appeasement or did he really mean what he said? Where is this man coming from. Although we are a nation of many religions we as a nation was still founded on Christian principals. Our laws and constitution was wrote from the Bible and it is clear for all to see. Now we have a element in our that is trying to remove the Christian influence from our laws and are trying to replace them with Shirah law, as well as the Muslim religion. Here a little and there a little this very thing is taking place!

  • Obama has also said some passage in the Bible are out of date for todays world. CEDoes he not know that the Bible has stood the test of time and still is the best selling book in he world. Nearly every prophecy in that Great book has come true. Obama claims to be a Christian so I believe that he needs to show it. If he would read the Bible he would see that “Forever thy Word is settled in heaven”, “Thy Word is a lamp unto my feet”, and there are more for him to read to see how ridiculous his statement was and still is. No true Christian would ever say that: “The greatest sound in the world is the call to Muslims to morning prayer” Do we really know this man who is our president?

  • Obama made the statement that the constitution is flawed. DOur present constitution has been around for over two hundred years and it has been a document that has stood the test of time. What needs to be changed about it? Could Obama's problem be that it was wrote by great men (our nations forefathers) who put their trust in the Creator. The one that was in the beginning of all things.

  • Obama bows to Islamic leaders. F Why does he bow to Islamic leaders? That shows a sign of weakness and being sub servant. That is a sure sign of appeasement. He is the president of the most powerful nation on the earth and appeasing people who want to kill us is not the thing to do. Is all the bowing, that Obama does, a sign of respect or is it something else. What ever it is, it is not something for the president of this great nation to do. A true Christian bows only to his Master and that is Jesus Christ!

  • Obama apologizes for America G The United States has done more for and lent more money (our tax dollars) than any other country on the face of this earth to nations that needed help. This country has also broke the yoke of oppression in countries that were being run by tyrants such as Saddam Hussein. Women are no longer stoned for being raped, they are no longer considered second class citizens, they can walk the streets alone (with out a man), children go to school, and there is freedom there. Billions of our tax payer dollars is going and have gone to help other countries. This is money that we will never get back. When a major problem develops in the world all nations look to the United States for help. For Obama to apologize for this country after all the good it has done is another sign of appeasement. Is this called being a weak leader or a leader with an agenda of his own?

  • Obama offends Israel and its people. H For the first year and a half of his term he would not have his picture taken with the leaders of Israel or greet them when they came to the white house. They either came through the side door or the back door. This was to

    appease the Islamic leaders. No wonder these people are not afraid of us.

America is fast becoming just like England, France, Denmark. Finland, Germany, and many other countries around the world where Islam is fast becoming a major influence in their law and way of life. The government and our leaders need to stop the appeasement and the so called tolerance for these cowardly acts of violence against the American people. Appeasement never has won a battle. We can look back in history and see this time and time again. For one example of trying to appease all we have to do is look back to the beginning of world war 2. The prime minister of England was Neville Chamberlain and he tried to appease Hitler and the Nazis'. His appeasement nearly caused the downfall of England and the free world. The same kind of appeasement is happening in our country and all over the world today. This country needs strong and decisive leadership to deal with this crisis that is at hand. We are not getting that from Obama and the Islamic terrorist are taking advantage of it. We do not need to be tolerant (as Obama is calling for) nor do we need to appease anybody. We need to show these terrorist and the countries that support them the might and the power of Uncle Sam.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

It is Bush’s Fault!



For the past two years, since Obama has been in office, all we hear is that Bush has caused the problems that this nation is facing. Is it really Bush’s fault because this country is where it is at today or is it the failed policies of the Obama administration. We are now two years into Obama's presidency and all we hear is that it is, still, Bush’s fault. Really! How much longer will it be Bush’s fault? We now have a president that thinks big government is the answer to all our problems. We have seen in the last two years more stimulus packages (most of the money has not been spent and most, not all, of the money that has been spent has gone to worthless projects that will not help the economy recover.) We have the biggest spending and the biggest deficits, ever, in this nation’s history. Spending, by the federal government, has gone thru the roof. The worthless programs that have been put into place, by Obama, has done nothing to help this economy, but rather has made it worse. So the best thing to do is blame it on Bush. It is Bush’s fault. That is the foremost policy of the Obama administration when things go wrong for them. Blame it on Bush!


This past Monday was the second Labor Day since Obama has been president , and the working people in this country has little to show for it other than thru the roof unemployment, wages that are going nowhere. The confidence that the American worker has in the future is just not there. Things like the, over the top, deficit for the last two years and the passing of Obama care has put a damper in the workers future. Due to these things it is hard for small business to keep workers employed let alone create new jobs. No wonder American confidence and expectation in the future is disappearing. And when confidence crumbles, consumers won't spend, lenders won't lend, investors won't invest, and businesses won't hire. It is simple as that. That is the way it always have been. As long as Obama takes money from the working people and give it to the people who will not work things will never look good.

Today we see businesses holding on to the money, rather than hiring. The small businesses that are still willing to take a chance and take on more obligations and barrowing money to expand are having enormous difficulty finding credit to expand and to make those new jobs. The people who we have elected as our politicians have promised a "summer of recovery", but they and their promises have delivered nothing to help us, we have nothing but economic sadness and depression. Most economic indicators in the last few months has been very disappointing—when they haven't been downright gloomy and depressing. But any kind of recovery, at all, will not happen and will never happen with the policies and the strategy that is coming out of Washington with Obama and his policies. In the last twenty months Obama has made an huge push to increase government spending and taxes. How will that ever help getting this country back on its feet. We are burning day light here. You cannot just keep on printing money to get us out of the mess we are in and blaming Bush will not help. Let us face facts. It is Obama’s lack of leadership and failures that has put us where we are today. Things might have been getting bad when he came into office, but he has had two years to turn things around and he is putting this nation in the hole more all the time.

Most Americans seem to be facing up to Obama’s failure much faster now. Thanks to the Internet, blogs that seek the truth and the increase of news resources on radio and television, Such as Fox News, it is frequently recognized that the current tax-and-spend policies of Obama and his buddies are holding back this country’s financial and economic recovery. Sometimes I think, as well as a lot of other people, That Obama does not want a recovery. Sometimes I think that he wants a country, who’s people, depends on the government for everything. I call it the Obama plantation, The first step, that must be taken, in turning around Obama’s failure is to face up fact that he and his democrat congress are getting the American people in deeper all the time. The second step is to vote him and every liberal democrat out as soon as possible. We must realize the fact that this country cannot spend a whole decade, as we did in the 1970s, compounding economic disaster upon economic tragedy. Facts may not hold back harmful and damaging agendas in our nation’s capital, but a politically aware electorate (People who have the legal right to vote) can disrupt and overturn the wrong-minded political, socialist, policies that Obama is, or wants to put into place.

The men and women who make up the American work force are a millions more reasons that we can be certain and confident in the future of this great country. Our private-sector work force, not the government, is the most industrious, pioneering, inventive, productive and determined in the world. The real working Americans are go-getters. We can overcome the government policies currently that are restraining and holding us back.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Your Social Security

Facts are Facts!!! I got this article on my Face Book Page and thought that it was worth passing on. By the way everything checks out.
Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message,  “NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" was removed that was found on all old Social Security card .

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,
No longer Voluntary
2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual
Incomes into the Program,
Now 7.65%
on the first $90,000
3.) That the money the participants elected to put
into the Program would be deductible from
their income for tax purposes each year,
No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the
independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the
general operating fund, and therefore, would
only be used to fund the Social Security
Retirement Program, and no other
Government program, and,
Under Johnson the money was moved to
The General Fund and Spent
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are
now receiving a Social Security check every month --
and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of
the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put
away' -- you may be interested in the following:
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ----
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the
independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the
general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically
controlled House and Senate.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax
deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -----
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social
Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the
'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the
Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
Q: Which Political Party decided to start
giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That's right!
Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65,
began to receive Social Security payments! The
Democratic Party gave these payments to them,
even though they never paid a dime into it!
------------ -- ------------ --------- ----- ------------ --------- ---------
Then, after violating the original contract (FICA),
the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of
awareness will be planted and maybe changes will
evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully
sure of what isn't so.
But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

The New Recruitment Center


The Ground Zero Mosque, that some muslins want to build, near to ground zero is not really a religious establishment. It would be, just as many mosques throughout our country are, and that is a terrorist recruitment, indoctrination and training center. A place of propaganda, It is not the worship of Islam that is the problem. It is the efforts to advance Shari Law with its requirement of Jihad and violence, that is the true issue. To build this new recruitment center (mosque) anywhere near ground zero goes against Americans everywhere and it sends a statement to the Muslim world that tells them that they have been victorious. The name Cordoba will be what the new mosque will be called and it is the same name used by Muslims centuries ago in Spain when they also built a mosque on ground that they conquered from Spain after slaughtering thousands of people. That says enough right there. Check it out for yourself.

Most people know that there is a world wide effort to advance and promote Shari Law and make it the legal system of the world. Feisal Abdul Rauf, the organizer of the planned Mosque, is helping to prepare a Shari Directory which rates countries on their level of compliance with Shari Law. Soon the United States will be just like England. Many courts in that country have recognized Shari as the governing law on matters between two Muslims. What we really have here is dangerous religion that is trying to impose itself on the citizens of this country. If America does not wake up it will be here also.

Shari Law has a cruel and brutal set of laws against which orders death by stoning, promotes child marriage, sanction and permits abuse of women, and gives wives no rights in divorce, but it also openly and clearly acknowledges the duty of all Muslims to carry on and conduct Jihad against non-believers and encourages and endorses violence to accomplish its goals. In this respect or in this way of thinking, violent and brutal Jihad is as natural in Shari Law as revolution is in Communist doctrine. The American people need to wake up and fast. It is true that there are some mosques where peaceful Muslims worship without promoting violence. A new study of Muslims and their mosques show that twenty percent of the mosques in this country have no contaminate of Shari law and basically endorses and encourages peaceful worship. But the problem is this: eighty percent are filled with violent literature, Shari teachings, and promotion of Jihad and its inevitable connection and that is terrorism.

This brings us down to the ground zero mosque in New York city. There can be no question or doubt in anybody’s mind that any mosque controlled by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf will have its base and be founded on Shari Law and will be nothing more than a local division of the Islamic terrorist aggression against this country. That such a place should be situated right next to the place where Jihad pulled off and achieved its most revolting victory is indescribably wrong. Obama is not making matters better when he tries to say the issue is one of religious freedom. In this country there is wide leeway to worship God as we choose. But on the other hand there is no breathing space or room to endorse and encourage violence and terrorism. The connection of Shari mosques with the 9-11 attackers and the Ft. Hood massacre shooter is so profound and far-reaching that it clearly shows the difference between a religious organization and an organization that supports and sponsors terrorism. Why is there a fifteen story mosque be built next to Ground Zero at the same time New York City is blocking the rebuilding of the only church destroyed during the 9-11 jihad attack against America? Where is the tolerance that we all have come use to hearing when it comes to the Muslims?

For Obama to come to the defense of the building of this mosque and him trying to make it a First Amendment matter is really unhelpful and for the most part show you where he is coming from and what he really is. This raise questions about his political wisdom. It is hard to believe how out of touch with the American people he must have become to take such a position, or is he really out of touch or does he know and just not care? It is time as Americans that we wake up and take our country back from people who would destroy it. It is no time for silence. It is a time to stand up and be counted!

"Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.” Thomas Mann

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." Winston Churchill

Just The Facts

Remember the old TV program “DRAGNET” with Jack Webb? One of his famous lines was “Just the facts”. So let us deal with just the facts toda...