During the Bush administration the federal government created The Department of Home Land Security to protect us from horrible and deadly terrorists attacks. The question that I would like to put forth to you who read this is : the U.S. government still serious about protecting Americans from the extreme violence of Islamic terrorist attacks – or isn't it? Is the word TERRORIST still allowed in the American vocabulary? Where does our leaders stand on this issue? I ask this question because The Department of Homeland Security, was created to defend this nation after the onslaught of Sept. 11 when Islamic terror attacks killed thousands of Americans in New York, Washington, DC, and Pennsylvania, but now has radically and quickly, since the presidential elections, shifted its focus on its true and most important duties, by earlier this year, advising police departments, the state police, county sheriff departments, and other law enforcement agencies across the nationwide to watch out for "right-wing extremists" – especially the returning war veterans, The people supporting the Second Amendment, the ones that oppose abortion and illegal immigration, and promoting U.S. sovereignty and the Constitution. Watch out and keep a good eye on the tea baggers because they could be extremist. Please tell me who is the enemy. Do we have a failure to communicate here or is there a problem with those who are in charge of this great Republic?
The U.S. Army ignored and did not heed piles of warning signs that Army Major Nidal Hasan was a brainwashed, jihadist sleeper just waiting to blow up – yet the army or FBI did absolutely nothing to avert the Fort Hood massacre of dozen or so American soldiers and the wounding and maiming of many others. The facts were all there before them and they did nothing to stop it for fear of being accused of profiling. It is called wanting to be “politically correct.” Those politically correct nuts will do it every time. Are they still going to avoid these signs as they did with Hasan so they can remain politically correct? Will political correctness stop them from preventing another massacre.
Five of the Gitmo terrorists – the worst of all that are or were in Gitmo, including the 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, who proclaims to the world, the government's terror charges are a "badge of honor" and the greatest thing that could happen to him is to be tried in civilian court in New York City, near ground zero, giving him, free of charge, a world wide stage so He and his buddies can farther spread their nut cake ideology all over the world, and while they are doing it they are opening up America's secrets on how we fight the war and what we know about them, so they can be discovered by the terrorists through their lawyers – and it is all paid for by us, the United States Taxpayers. Where are we as a nation headed. We must wake up.
More than one Islamic terror training camps are operating right under the nose of law enforcement, not in some far-off land, but all across the USA and we once again do nothing about this major threat, but if you are a gun owner, against abortion, or a returning soldier look out because you are on a watch list if you speak out. Once again what is wrong with this picture. What's going on here?
Does the government really care about national security anymore? Let me ask you this question: Why do you think, or tell me why, whenever there's a terror attack on American soil, the FBI always declares and states right away – before it could possibly know what the cause was, that the attack was not terror-related? This is before all the facts are in. Why do they do that?
Why does the media cook up the most stupid explanations for terrorism – such as this one: Time magazine blaming post traumatic stress disorder for Hasan's Fort Hood rampage (even though he was never deployed in a war zone and never did know the taste of war) or the Associated Press' disclosure revealing that the Hasan was "lonely"? Or why did the press give six different theories to explain the terror and deaths caused by the beltway sniper {John Muhammad}, but not one news outlet mentioned jihad as a possible motive when the plain simple fact is, he was a convert to Islam and who knows how much farther he cared it his new religion and for what reasons.. We will never know the rest of the story.
Why does President Obama use every chance made available to him for the opportunity to criticize and pick apart America and always go overboard for Islam – even calling America "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world" and bowing subserviently before the Muslim king of Saudi Arabia? What is that really telling us? If you are a Muslim nation you are governed by Muslim laws and I do not think that is the case – YET – in this country. Meanwhile, Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano, who demonizes pro-lifers, to no end, and war veterans as Tim McVeigh wannabes just goes to far. She has appointed her advisory council head,Kareem Shora, who, by the way, is the national executive director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, whose officials have labeled deadly anti-U.S. jihadists as "heroes" and opposed referring to Hamas as a terrorist organization when any body with a lick of sense knows that is exactly what Hamas is. Once again I ask: What is happening here? Who are the nut cakes running this country?
As far as I'm concerned there is nothing that demonstrates the national-security of the Obama
administration better than its eagerness to see threats where none exist while being unwilling and unable to see those that are staring us in the face. The kind that will kill thousands of Americans if there is a chance. There has to be something wrong with this picture! The evil of 'political correctness – the undemocratic influence of thought, put on us by twisted people, some of who are in our government, people who hate America and everything our soldiers have fought, and continue to fight and die for has to end. We must put a stop to it.
Our right to own fire arms is under attack now like it never has been before. We have a right to own a gun for defense of family and home,We have a right to own a gun for hunting, shooting or collecting. We have the right to own a gun to break the chains of tyranny. Our Founding Fathers said it. Our Constitution guarantees it. Our courts affirm it. Our laws protect it. Yet there are politicians, bureaucrats and members of the media elite who want to tread and trample on and do away with our freedoms. They portray law-abiding gun owners as the members of some lunatic fringe. They attack us in the press and call us second-class citizens. Obama said during his campaign that some people want to cling to their Bibles and guns. What does he mean by that? That statement is clearly putting us in a different class. Why?
Lets get down to the facts! Are we being attacked by nut cakes who use terrorism as their means of getting their message across? The answer is yes and it started way before 911. Are people of this country that voice the opinions against political correctness bad people to be watched? No! Are people who against gun control, abortion, and more government control bad people or anti government? The answer is no!
No comments:
Post a Comment